The Comparison of Reading a Book and Watching a Movie Essay

The Comparison of Reading a Book and Watching a Movie - Essay Example Watching a movie on the other hand needs only a little effort from the audience. Everything including character voices, scenery and real outside world are readily presented to the audience. The audience watches only the shortened version of the book episodes. One gets emotionally attached to the movie through the emotions being portrayed by the characters in the movie. What an author of a book may try to explain in many pages might be large to an extent that it may not be completely covered in a movie, this because, most of the movie producers usually stick to plot of the movie thus eliminating the long lines in the book. Thus, in general movies lack the vivid explanation that the author of the book intended for the reader. In addition to that, while reading a book one can leave a bookmark in order to pick up quickly from where one left the last time they were reading. On the other hand, watching a movie does not give you the chance to pick from where you left last time. You have to start in order to enjoy it. While reading a book, the reader can imagine the characters presented in it according to the characteristics and descriptions. In between its pages, a book provides a sweet escape from reality where imagination reigns supreme. One can make them up in their head as they want to. In movies, this is not so as there are ready finished ideal characters presented as heroes. This may be upsetting to most people. One becomes a critic of the author as they read a book. This better because you know first-hand the real information contained in it. Also books have rich vocabularies without any wrong words and they can enrich the reader’s vocabulary. Watching a movie makes one become a critic of the producer. This is less advantageous than the book reader because one does not know what was written before. Also movies lack a rich collection of vocabularies as compared to books. Reading a book can take a

Reconstruction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Reconstruction - Essay Example The above mentioned scenario, as well as the events that followed in the attempted reconstruction of the American South by the Republican Party, were catalogued by several historians, with each historian instilling their own perspective into their recording of events. For the purposes of this paper an elucidation of the views of the views of four historians and their texts will be provided. These include: Reconstruction by Thomas Wilson, The Negro in Reconstruction by Carter Woodson, The Ordeal of Reconstruction by Thomas A. Bailey, and Reconstruction: Unfinished Revolution by Mary Beth Norton. Overview The views expressed by the different authors are to an extent the products of their particular time and prevalent historical school of thought and as such are reflective of it in terms of the language used. Each text is also characterized by the amount of words dedicated to each issue depending on the particular perspective of each author. Wilson is generally extremely critical of the Northern carpetbaggers and derisory of the competence of the â€Å"negroes† while being wholly sympathetic to the plight of the Southern White. Woodson on the other hand, is focused primarily on the role of the â€Å"Negroe† and in attempting to absolve him of the corruption and mismanagement that plagued the era. Bailey highlights the incompetence and illiteracy of the â€Å"negroes† while painting a bleak picture of the government and policies of time, keeping in line with the other authors. Norton, is perhaps the only author to portray reconstruction and the Northern immigrants in a positive light, while being highly critical of the role of the Southern White gentry. Carpet Baggers Thomas Wilson in his piece Reconstruction places the blame for the failure of reconstruction solely on the carpetbaggers or opportunistic Northern immigrants and dedicates the majority of the piece to the exploitative activities of the above. Wilson states: â€Å"These men, mere â€Å"carpet baggers† for the most part, who brought nothing with them, and had nothing to bring but a change of clothing and their wits, became the new masters of the blacks.† Wilson’s implication here is that all Northern immigrants were â€Å"carpet baggers†, individuals who had little wealth to offer the South and instead came to exploit its resources. There is no mention of Northerners who may have possibly arrived to assist in the improvement of the conditions of African Americans. Another inference that can be drawn from the above statement is that Wilson had beliefs that the â€Å"carpet baggers† were perpetuating the system of slavery, albeit indirectly by manipulating the â€Å"blacks. Carter Woodson while taking a critical view of the role of the â€Å"carpet baggers† also accepts that some of them did have principled intentions: Referring to the â€Å"carpet baggers† he states: â€Å"They were in many respects selfish men , but not always utterly lacking in principle.† However, he does acknowledge that much of wholesale corruption during the era was a result of the greed of the â€Å"carpet baggers†: â€Å"Being adventurers and interested in their own affairs, the carpet baggers became unusually corrupt in certain states.† Thomas Bailey is for the most part silent on the role of â€Å"carpet baggers† but he does state: â€Å"Graft and theft ran wild, especially in states like Louisiana and South Carolina,